Category

Comments

Entity Model

Entities modeled were clearly explained.

Entities used the correct naming conventions

There was no confusion between attributes and entities.

ERModel:

Relationships

All the relationships have the appropriate name, direction, optionality, and degree/cardinality.

Written Documentation

The information requirements of the business/organization are clearly documented.

The business rules as they apply to the information requirements of the animal shelter are clearly stated.

The assumptions and constraints that had to be considered are clearly stated.

Revision requests by the client were documented.

Design changes were implemented as requested by the client

Presentation: Materials

The visuals, if used, presented the main points.  Correct grammar and spelling used throughout.

Presentation Effectiveness

The presentation is persuasive with a cent4ql message and supporting arguments.

The analysis of the business rules, operations and processes is logical, clear, and easy for the client to understand.

Non-technical terms were used when describing the ERD.

Presentation:  Public Speaking

Each person presented a portion of the presentation.

Presenters used eye contact, upright posture, gestures, and other nonverbal communication to persuade the client of the superiority of their  ERD.

All questions were answered using clear, concise rationale.

Points Totals:

 18- 20 = 90 – 100%; 16 – 17 =  80 – 90%;

14 – 15 = 70 – 80%; 12 – 13 = 60 – 70%